
Comparison Between the Roles of MBR and MBBR in Wastewater Treatment
Wastewater treatment is one of the critical environmental challenges facing the world today. The use of Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) technologies are among the most widely used methods in this field. Therefore, in this article, we will compare the roles of MBR and MBBR and their importance in improving the quality of treated water.
What is MBR?
MBR is a system that combines traditional biological treatment with membrane filtration. Organic materials in the wastewater are broken down by microorganisms in aerated tanks, and then the purified water is separated using fine or ultrafine membranes.
Advantages of MBR:
- High-Quality Water: Produces treated water of very high quality, suitable for reuse.
- Less Space Required: Requires less space compared to traditional systems, as it doesn’t need large settling tanks.
- Effective Solid Removal: Efficiently removes solids and harmful microbes.
- Low Sludge Production: Operates under high biomass conditions with low sludge production, reducing sludge handling costs.
- Energy Demand: The high microbial biomass requires sufficient aeration, leading to higher energy consumption.
- Membrane Maintenance: Regular cleaning or backwashing is necessary to prevent membrane fouling.
Disadvantages of MBR:
- High Operating and Maintenance Costs: Membrane costs and continuous maintenance can be expensive.
- Membrane Sensitivity: Membranes are prone to clogging or damage.
What is MBBR?
MBBR is a treatment system that uses small plastic carriers added to the biological tanks to provide a larger surface area for microorganisms to grow, thereby enhancing the efficiency of organic matter breakdown in the wastewater.
Advantages of MBBR:
- Simple Design: A straightforward and flexible system that can easily be integrated into existing systems.
- Lower Maintenance: It requires less maintenance than MBR.
- High Efficiency: Provides high efficiency in treating high organic loads.
- Effective Organic Removal: High efficiency in organic matter removal with good nitrogen and phosphorus removal.
- No Regular Backwashing: This doesn’t require regular backwashing.
- Post-Treatment Sedimentation: Sedimentation is required after treatment.
Disadvantages of MBBR:
- Larger Volume: Requires more water and space compared to the MBR system.
- Limited Fine Solid Removal: It may be less effective in removing fine solids compared to MBR.
Choosing Between MBR and MBBR for Your Application
Both MBR and MBBR are effective solutions for wastewater treatment, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. The choice of the appropriate system depends on the project requirements, available budget, and the desired quality of the treated water.
Simplified Comparison of MBR and MBBR
This comparison highlights the key differences between MBR and MBBR in a simplified manner. Further detailed explanations will be provided in upcoming articles, given the importance of understanding these distinctions to ensure the appropriate selection of water treatment technology. Our Carewater experts are always ready to assist you in making the right decision.
Treatment Method | MBBR | MBR |
Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor | Membrane Bio Reactor | |
Capital Cost ($/m3) | Low | High |
Operating Cost ($/m3) | Low | High |
Required Footprint | Low | Average |
Need for very fine pretreatment | No | Yes |
Need for chemicals | No | Yes |
Operation ease | Easy, as water flows by gravity between unit | Difficult due to the risk of fouling the membrane |
Operator required | As usual, ordinary skills | High, due to risk of fouling |
Need for recycle waste sludge pumps | No | Yes |
Resistance to power cut | Up to 24 hours | Up to 24 hours |
Resistance to blockage | High resistance | Low resistance |
Power usage | Low | High |
Treatment Level | High | High |
Lifetime of main component responsible of treatment | >25 years (MBBR Biomedia) | 2-5 years (Membrane) or less when fouling |